Apr
25
2009

200+ Living Philosophers of Religion and Their Best Work

philosophers

(last updated 01/22/2010; current count is 202 philosophers)

To give you a brief sketch of contemporary philosophy of religion, here’s a list of 200+ living philosophers of religion who publish in English, along with a few of their most significant books/papers in philosophy of religion. (I’ve listed a few people who aren’t philosophers of religion but who have published at least one influential work in the field – e.g. Jaakko Hintikka, John Earman, Robert Kane, etc.)

The list is not interested in philosophers of religion who only publish work on what earlier philosophers have said. Finally, I must note this is technically a list of philosophers of religion who were alive as of the date this post was first published: 04/25/2009. As philosophers who were living at that time die off, I’m not going to remove them from this list.

In compiling this list, I noticed that the philosophy of religion appears to be dominated by theists (in the English world, anyway). I guess that is not surprising. After all, if there was such a thing as the “philosophy of werewolves,” one would not expect many of us werewolf disbelievers to bother gaining expertise in disproving werewolves. We’ve got better things to do with our time. In contrast, hundreds of academic theists believe it is their God-given cosmic purpose to clarify and defend theism from the world of professional philosophy.

Also see Prosblogion’s Most Important Philosophy of Religion Articles (many of them are linked to the PDF, below).

I will keep this list updated, so please comment with corrections and suggestions. My labels of each philosopher’s personal beliefs are mostly guesses, so please correct me if I’m wrong!

letters a

letters b

letters c

letters d

letters e

letters f

letters g

letters h

letters i

letters j

letters k

letters l

letters m

letters n

letters o

letters p

letters r

letters s

letters t

letters v

letters w

Please remember to comment with additions and corrections. If you can send me a PDF of any articles not linked above, send it to:

“lukeprog [at] gmail [dot] com”

Updates since January 2010

  • 01/22/2010 added Stephen R.L. Clark
  • 01/31/2010 added Philip Clayton
  • 01/31/2010 added Vincent Brümmer
  • 01/31/2010 added Elizabeth Burns
  • 01/31/2010 added Robert Fogelin
  • 01/31/2010 added Phillip Wiebe
  • 02/03/2010 added Katherin Rogers
  • 02/05/2010 added Stephen Cahn
  • 02/05/2010 added Stephen Grover
  • 02/05/2010 added James Muyskens
  • 02/05/2010 added Gary Gutting
  • 02/08/2010 added David McNaughton
  • 02/08/2010 added Derk Pereboom
Notes:
  1. Flew was an atheist for most of his academic career, but recently became a deist. []
  2. Quentin described his views to me like this: “According to established meaning of ‘atheism’, I am an atheist. But I have also called myself a practitioner of ‘explanatory atheism’ (I try to explain why the universe exists using only atheistic principles). I am in search of an ‘ultimate reality’ that does not fit any conventional religious model or even the meaning of the word “religion” in our culture. I am in search of an atheistic ‘One’ or ‘Supreme Being’ that is a naturalistic replacement for religion and supernatural beings, but which is not itself a new type of religious reality.” []

120 Comments »

  • Reginald Selkirk

    Alvin Plantinga: Finding bold new ways to hide the question-begging.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 25, 2009
  • Stanley

    I notice that there are very few women amongst this list of philosophers of religion. My wife suggests that this is because men are mostly concerned with feathering their own nest, pontificating about their opinions, and generally furthering their own dominance of the academic world. Just as I treat adverts on the TV (i.e. I do not buy anything I see advertised) I would only listen to a female philosopher of religion!  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 25, 2009
  • Lorkas

    Interesting, since women are, on average, more religious than men.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 25, 2009
  • Andrew Atkinson

    WoW what a list.  Off the top of my head I would add 
    1.Comparison of Judeo-Christian Theism and Philosophical Naturalism As Explanatory Worldviews (Dec 30, 2007) by Jason A. Beyer and Paul K. Moser  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 25, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Added, thanks.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 25, 2009
  • toweltowel

    To be fair to philosophy of religion, there are relatively few women in philosophy generally. Here’s some commentary (a pdf) by Sally Haslanger on the unwelcoming and unfair conditions faced by women in philosophy.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 25, 2009
  • toweltowel

    A few names that occur to me:

    Stephen Maitzen, Michael J. Murray, Yujin Nagasawa, Philip L. Quinn, Edward Wierenga  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 25, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Maitzen is on there. Dunno how I missed Wierenga and Murray. Quinn died in 2004. I’d never heard of Nagasawa.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 25, 2009
  • toweltowel

    Also: John Hare, Klaas J. Kraay  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 25, 2009
  • toweltowel

    Oh, and is Wainwright now an atheist, or is that a typo?  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 25, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Wainwright fixed, others added, along with a few more I found. Thanks again for the additions.

    I love the young guys; they put all their articles online!  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 25, 2009
  • Looking through my copies of Philo, I find quite a few more philosophers on religion: Paul Kurtz, Charles Echelbarger, Theodore Schick, Glenn Branch, Arnold T. Guminski, Aaron Holland, Matt McCormick (he even has a blog!), Owen McLeod, Stephen T. Davis, Mark Vuletic, Peter Byrne, Jeffrey Lowder, Timothy Madigan, etc. I’m sure there are more philosophers who’ve published in that journal.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 25, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Danny,

    Thanks for the list. Obviously, there are hundreds of philosophers of religion I haven’t listed yet.

    I couldn’t find a list of peer-reviewed work by Kurtz, do you know if there is a list online?

    I don’t see many publications on religion by Echelbarger or Vuletic. Byrne is already on the list. For some of these (Branch, Holland…), I can only find a single article on philosophy of religion in a peer-reviewed journal.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 25, 2009
  • Well, they have published works in Philo, the journal of the Society of Humanist Philosophers. As for Kurtz, he has published books and articles advancing humanist philosophy, which may or may not be peer reviewed.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 25, 2009
  • Pablo Stafforini

    Adolf Grünbaum (atheist, retired)

    I second the suggestion to add Paul Kurtz to the list.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 26, 2009
  • exrelayman

    Wow! No Robert Price? Maybe I don’t know what religious philosophy is.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 26, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Pablo Stafforini,

    I’ve added Grunbaum now, thanks. To add Kurtz, I would need some suggestions as to the significant academic papers he has written about atheism. I can’t find a bibliography for him.

    Pablo, I see you organized a study group on Parfit. I haven’t gotten to Parfit yet, but he’s definitely on my reading list. It sounds like he’s offered several criticisms of desire-based theories of morality that would be relevant to my “defense” of desire utilitarianism. Do you have any thoughts on that?  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 26, 2009
  • lukeprog

    exrelayman,

    No, I don’t think you do know what philosophy of religion is. But fear not! For I have written an introduction to philosophy of religion.

    Robert Price works and publishes in the field of Biblical criticism, not philosophy of religion.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 26, 2009
  • This post has been linked for the HOT5 Daily 4/27/2009, at <a href=”http://unreligiousright.blogspot.com/”>The Unreligious Right</a>  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 27, 2009
  • Stanley

    Searching for one or two more women, I suggest Karen Armstrong and Mary Midgley? This is a very interesting and useful  list, thank you!

    Also, how about John Polkinghorne?  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 27, 2009
  • Ibn Abu Talib

    Wow! Most of these theist philosophers of religion are Christians! I think you should include the names of such savants as Ismail Raji Al Faruqi and Mohammad Iqbal as well.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 27, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Stanley,

    Karen Armstrong is a historian of comparative religion, not a philosopher of religion. Midgley is a moral philosopher; I’ll have to look and see if she’s written much about philosophy of religion. Polkinghorne is a borderline philosopher of religion; I’ll consider adding him.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 27, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Ibn Abu Talib,

    Thanks. I’ll look into those two and consider adding them.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 27, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Ibn Abu Talib,

    Both of those Muslim philosophers are dead. This is a list of LIVING philosophers of religion.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 28, 2009
  • Matt

    Three theist philosophers of religion in the contential vein: Jean-Luc Marion (U Chicago), James K. A. Smith (Calvin), William Desmond (KU Leuven). Two atheists: Jean-Luc Nancy (Strasbourg, I think), Giorgio Agamben (Turin; he does a lot of work at the intersection of political philosophy and religion/theology).  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 29, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Thanks, Matt. Unfortunately for the two atheists, it does not appear they publish much of anything in English, though some of their work has been translated.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 29, 2009
  • Eric

    John Haldane (University of St Andrews) definitely belongs on this list. Stephen Law (Heythrop College) would be a nice addition to the atheists, too.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 30, 2009
  • Eric

    Oh, and Ralph McInerny and Ed Feser.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 30, 2009
  • Nathaniel

    Unless something has changed very recently, Brian Pitts (whom you list as James Pitts) is a theist, not an atheist.

    For Neil Manson, you should probably list God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 30, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Nathaniel and Eric, thanks again for your corrections and contributions.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 30, 2009
  • Matt

    Nancey Murphy  

    (Quote)

    Comment | April 30, 2009
  • Andrei Buckareff

    John Bishop from Auckland should be added.  He’s a theist.  But he’s a non-classical theist and a reconciliatory naturalist (there are a few of us theists who actually reject supernaturalism–but we are a minority among analytic philosophers of religion).  Also, for a living Islamic philosopher of religion (who also rejects classical theism), you should list Imran Aijaz (also at Auckland).  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 1, 2009
  • smrdina

    I think Nick Trakakis is a theist.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 1, 2009
  • Timothy

    Just curious, what’s your source for calling Yujin Nagasawa a theist?   I’m not saying he’s not, I’ve just been trying to find out information about his religious background.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 1, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Thanks, Andrei! Two very interesting additions.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 1, 2009
  • lukeprog

    smrdina,

    Oops! Fixed.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 1, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Timothy: what’s your source for calling Yujin Nagasawa a theist?

    I don’t know. A look at his CV doesn’t give me any clues. Anybody know?  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 1, 2009
  • Haecceitas

    Chad Meister and Jay Wesley Richards coud be added. Doug Groothuis might qualify as well?

    Not sure if Stenger and Carrier should be listed. I know that Carrier likes to call himself a philosopher, but I don’t think that he has a degree in philosophy. Stenger seems to have held (perhaps still does) the title “adjunct professor of philosophy”, but I’m not aware of him having a philosophy degree either. Perhaps I’m mistaken on this?  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 2, 2009
  • Haecceitas

    Also, Thomas V. Morris should be on the list.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 2, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Hilarious internet nickname, Haecceitas. :)

    Thanks for your recommendations.

    A philosophy degree is not required to make the list. Stenger and Carrier have published several articles that are taken seriously by the philosophical community, and have published in peer-reviewed philosophy of religion journals like Philo.

    I don’t really see any top-level academic publications by Meister. I see an intro text, some edited (but not written) books, and a book review.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 2, 2009
  • Haecceitas

    Sorry about dropping the names in separate posts, but a few others came to mind.

    Austin Dacey

    Bede Rundle

    Anthony Kenny  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 2, 2009
  • Haecceitas

    Btw, the list seems to be polarized between theist and atheist philosophers. There might be some pantheists that are being left out. Wouldn’t John Leslie be one of them?  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 2, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Yeah, I’ve been meaning to make the “belief labels” more specific. Dacey doesn’t seem to have published much academic work in philosophy of religion yet.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 2, 2009
  • Andrei Buckareff

    John Leslie, while a pantheist, is a Christian.  There are some philosophers of religion who describe themselves as Christian but are pantheists or panentheists.  Leslie is one.  John Bishop is another.  There are more.  But who is counting heads?  I count myself among such heretics.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 2, 2009
  • Eric

    What about  John Joseph Haldane,  University of St Andrews? Michael Novak and Michael Dummett  would also be fine additions. Perhaps Peter Kreeft, too?  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 3, 2009
  • lukeprog

    I can’t find any work in philosophy of religion by Michael Dummett. I’m also having a hard time tracking down the academic work of Peter Kreeft; it is overwhelmed by his popular work. I’ll add the others.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 3, 2009
  • I would definitely put David Lewis (atheist) on the list. Admittedly, his main area is not philosophy of religion, but
    (a) he’s one of the greatest philosophers ever, and
    (b) his essay “evil for freedom’s sake?” is a true classic, and “divine evile” is pretty interesting as well.

    (Oh yeah, he’s no longer alive… Maybe that explains the omission.)

    Another thing (slightly off topic): I’m anxious to read your review of the Craig-Kagan debate. The first debate I have seen that (in my opinion) Craig clearly lost… Kagan is *killing* him in the Q&A part :-)

    Besides, I really enjoy your blog. Keep up the good work!  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 7, 2009
  • Facilis

    Where are Gary Habermas and Anthony Flew?  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 8, 2009
  • I think William J. Abraham (Southern Methodist University) deserves a mention.

    Crossing the Threshold of Divine Revelation (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2007), Canon and Criterion in Christian Theology (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998); The Logic of Evangelism (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1989), The Rationality of Religious Belief, edited with Steven W. Holtzer (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987); Divine Revelation and the Limits of Historical Criticism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000); An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1985)  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 8, 2009
  • BCAB

    J.R. Lucas should probably be on the list. He’s published a number of articles and a book on omniscience and foreknowledge (’The Future’, published by Basil Blackwell in 1989), a book of essays on philosophical theology (’Freedom and Grace’, Basil Blackwell, 1971), and has defended a particular version of the ontological argument in a variety of different places. Here is his website, where most of his articles are available for download and there is a comprehensive bibliography: http://users.ox.ac.uk/~jrlucas/

    And yes, he is still alive.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 8, 2009
  • BCAB

    I forgot to mention: Lucas is currently retired, but taught at Merton College, Oxford.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 8, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Facilis: Where are Gary Habermas and Anthony Flew?

    Habermas is not a philosopher. Flew is on there.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 8, 2009
  • lukeprog

    BCAB,

    Added, thanks!  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 8, 2009
  • BCAB

    No worries.

    And one more thing: you have Anthony Kenny labeled as an ‘atheist’, though Kenny quite explicitly does not identify as an atheist, and has given arguments for why. He describes himself as an ‘agnostic’.

    A useful reference list for authors to read, though. Thanks, Luke.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 8, 2009
  • Facilis

    Gary Habermas is a research professor of philosophy at Liberty U and has published many articles in Philosophia Christi and his research on the Historical Jesus has been highly influential in natural theology. If Victor Stenger and Richard Carrier are on there I’m sure habermas should be.
    http://www.garyhabermas.com/habermas_resume.htm
    http://www.garyhabermas.com/publications.htm  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 9, 2009
  • blah

    Michael Dummett has dealt with prayer (I think) in his ‘Bringing about the past’. He also has a paper called ‘Biblical Exegesis and the Resurrection’. There are lots of women philosophers of religion missed out:
    Pamela Sue Anderson (Christian), Oxford.
    Janet Martin Soskice (Christian), Cambridge.
    Janine Marie Idziak (sp?).
    Sarah Coakley.
    Harriet A Harris.

    John Cottingham (Christian), retired.
    David Oderberg (Christian), Reading.
    Bruce Langtry.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 9, 2009
  • Facilis

    Oh and can I suggest you add Shandon L. Guthrie to the list.
    http://sguthrie.net/author.php  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 9, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Facilis, I’ll add Habermas. I wasn’t aware of some of his more philosophical publications. But I can’t find any by Guthrie.

    blah, thanks for naming the Dummett papers. I’ve added him. Could you name some papers for Harris and Idziak?  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 9, 2009
  • Anomalous

    Brian Davies, Fordham.  He’s written mostly about Aquinas, but he’s also written a fair amount of non-historical stuff.  Most importantly, The Reality of God and the Problem of Evil is the best recent book in the philosophy of religion, and anybody who thinks guys like Swinburne and Plantinga make sense needs to read it.  It’s inspired by Aquinas, but it isn’t a book on Aquinas.

    And for the love of God, add Anthony Kenny.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 9, 2009
  • Anomalous

    Whoops, I missed Kenny the first time around. I’m not sure if Bob Kane is a Christian, though.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 9, 2009
  • David Gordon

    I think that Bede Rundle is wrongly listed as a Christian. His book is a criticism of theism.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 9, 2009
  • blah

    Sure:
    http://philpapers.org/autosense.pl?searchStr=Janine%20Marie%20Idziak

    Harris has edited ‘Faith and Philosophical Analysis’ with Chris Insole.
    You may wish to add John Foster (The Divine Lawmaker) and Bas Van Fraasen (The Empirical Stance).  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 10, 2009
  • David Alexander

    Theodore Gulesarian is at Arizona State University

    You should probably add: Robert Roberts (Baylor University)
    Thomas Hibbs (Baylor University)
    Michael Foley (Baylor University)
    Doug Henry (Baylor University)
    Michael Beaty (Baylor University)
    Trent Dougherty (Baylor University)
    Robert Koons (University of Texas at Austin)
    Trenton Merricks (University of Virginia, I think)
    Theodore Sider (NYU)
    Kevin Corcoran (Calvin College)
    Alfred Freddoso (Univerity of Notre Dame)

    I apologize if some of the above names are already on your list  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 13, 2009
  • lukeprog

    David,

    Thanks. Could you list some significant papers/books in philosophy of religion from each of these philosophers?  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 13, 2009
  • Jay Carlson

    Good interesting list.  James Keller is not an independent, however.  He’s at Wofford College, where he was my advisor for my first year and a half as a philosophy student.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 22, 2009
  • wowow

    Is Richard Gale really an atheist? I am pretty sure he is a theist. Also, I wonder about Robert Fogelin.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 31, 2009
  • wowow

    I really do think Basil Mitchell (retired) should surely be included.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | May 31, 2009
  • cartesian

    Robert Kane is Catholic. He’s on board with the Nicene Creed, though not with the stuff about contraception or abortion.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | June 3, 2009
  • Peter

    Are you sure Peter Byrne is a Christian? What’s your reason for thinking so?  

    (Quote)

    Comment | June 30, 2009
  • Robert Gressis

    Gale considers himself neither a theist, nor an atheist, nor an agnostic.  When asked how he identifies himself, his answer is that he doesn’t care.
    The Adamses are, as of July 2009, at UNC, Chapel Hill.
    J. Brian Pitts is a Christian theist.
    Ted Sider’s only paper on philosophy of religion, as far as I know, is “Hell and Vagueness”, but it’s very well-regarded and has generated a lot of response.
    Eleonore Stump should be in bold-face, as she’s inarguably one of the most important philosophers of religion alive.
    Descriptions of Corcoran’s contributrions to philosophy of religion can be found on his website.  He also has a blog.
    Links to many of Robert Koons’s papers on philosophy of religion can be found on his website.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | June 30, 2009
  • Great list. I’m surprised you don’t consider John Hick an uber-philosopher, given his influence on the rationality of theism debates in analytic philosophy back in the ’60s, particularly with his first work, Faith and Knowledge. Also, his later works in theodicy and pluralism have changed the nature of those discussions dramatically.
    One of Hick’s former doctoral students might also be worthy of mention, Harold Netland (Trinity Evangelical Divinity School). He has two important works on pluralism, Dissonant Voices and Encountering Religious Pluralism, as well as a recent book on Buddhism co-authored with Keith Yandell (http://www.amazon.com/Buddhism-Christian-Exploration-Keith-Yandell/dp/0830838554/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1246382506&sr=8-3). Also, has articles in Faith and Philosophy and elsewhere.
    Finally, while I agree that Chad Meister may not merit inclusion on this list quite yet, I believe that he is someone to keep an eye on over the next couple years. He is working on a number of original works at the moment with publications in philosophy of religion forthcoming. See http://chadmeister.com/about/#publications.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | June 30, 2009
  • Surprised not to find John Milbank and Anthony Thiselton here  

    (Quote)

    Comment | June 30, 2009
  • RicoG

    Rob Koons is Catholic.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | June 30, 2009
  • jon kvanvig

    Regarding footnote 1, there’s this citation-based ranking at Prosblogion that I generated a couple years ago:
    http://prosblogion.ektopos.com/archives/2007/12/top-philosopher.html
     
       

    (Quote)

    Comment | June 30, 2009
  • Matthew

    John Schellenberg is agnostic. He doesn’t think there is enough evedince to determine one way or the other.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | June 30, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Peter,

    No, I’m not sure at all. Most of these labels are quick guesses based on a glance at their CV. Please correct if you know better.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | June 30, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Thanks, Robert Gressis.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | June 30, 2009
  • lukeprog

    D C Cramer and adhunt:

    Added, thanks.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | June 30, 2009
  • lukeprog

    jon kvanvig,

    Thanks!  

    (Quote)

    Comment | June 30, 2009
  • Robert Gressis

    lukeprog,
    You’re welcome! Also, Wes Morriston is a Christian theist, at least according to William Lane Craig in a podcast he put up this year.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | June 30, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Robert,

    Wes himself denies this, though.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | June 30, 2009
  • Robert Gressis

    Oh, I had no idea Wes denied this.  Did he do so on Prosblogion?  Thanks for letting me know!  

    (Quote)

    Comment | June 30, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Robert,

    I remember reading some comments from Wes stressing that he is a ‘non-traditional theist’, however I’ve also noticed that he serves as an officer for the Society of Christian Philosophers, so… I’m not sure!  

    (Quote)

    Comment | June 30, 2009
  • Hick might be more accurately called a “pluralist” than a “christian,” though he has identified critically with the Christian tradition throughout his career. At the present, he is neither a thiest in the traditional sense nor an atheist, but something more like an Ultimate Reality-ist.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | July 1, 2009
  • Matt

    To Peter Forrest’s entry you should add his recent book “Developmental Theism” (OUP, 2007 or so).  

    (Quote)

    Comment | July 2, 2009
  • nico2

    Here are some more who work in pol philos and phil religion:
    Chris Eberle (Navy)
    Mark Murphy (Gtown)
    Terence Cuneo (Vermont)
    Paul Weithman (ND)  

    (Quote)

    Comment | July 2, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Matt and nico2,

    Thanks.

    But I can’t find many papers on (non-historical) philosophy of religion by Cuneo or Weithman.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | July 2, 2009
  • I read William Vallicella’s blog, and I was under the impression he only classfied himself as a traditional theist, but _not_ specifically as a Christian. In a discussion with Alexander Pruss a bit ago, he said he was *sympathetic to* Christianity, but such a case hardly justifies labeling the sympathizer a Christian, and seems to imply a ready distinction between the speaker and being a Christian.

    Does he elsewhere say he is a Christian?  

    (Quote)

    Comment | July 4, 2009
  • Robert G. Wolf

    You might add Brian Leftow (University of Oxford).  He is an Episcopelian.  Time and eternity is his first published book.  He has 2 books on Aquinas  listed as forthcoming, as well as a couple of dozen articles in various peer-reviewed journals.
    Articles on philosophy of religion by Michael Dummett are in New Blackfriars.  I’ve listed several of them in my 1997 bibliography on analytic philosophy of religion.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | July 4, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Thanks, Robert.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | July 4, 2009
  • Sam

    How about posting who is who in the topmost photo?  

    (Quote)

    Comment | July 6, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Let’s see, from left to right, row by row, looks like we’ve got:
    Quentin Smith, Peter van Inwagen, Nicholas Wolterstorff, Mike Almeida, Alvin Plantinga
    William Hasker, William Alston, Wes Morriston, Victor Reppert, William Lane Craig
    (forgot), R.M. Adams, Richard Swinburne, (forgot), Daniel Howard-Snyder
    (forgot), Julian Baggini, J.P. Moreland, Graham Oppy, Evan Fales

    Who can fill in the gaps?  

    (Quote)

    Comment | July 6, 2009
  • Matthew

    The two women who bracket Daniel Howard-Snyder are Marilyn McCord Adams and Lynne Rudder Baker.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | July 7, 2009
  • Scylla

    Great job compiling the list however you left off New Zealand’s most prominent Philosophers of Religion, Dr Matthew Flannagan and Dr Glenn Peoples.
    Flannagan’s work is in Plantingan epistemology, religion and morality and applied ethics. He has been published in the likes of The Journal of Medicine and Ethics, Think, Colloquium, The Journal of Libertarian Studies. He teaches History of Philosophy and Philosophical issues in Education for the Philosophy of Religion departments of two theological institutions. His blog, mandm.org.nz, is one of the most widely read blogs in New Zealand and attempts to take philosophy to the layman. While its main thrust is at non-philosophers, it appears to be an effort to making philosophy more accessible, Flannagan does put his more considered academic works on it too. He also runs the Auckland branch of Thinking Matters, an organisation aimed at equipping the lay person with rudimentary philosophy of religion skills.
    Dr Peoples has done most of his work on religion in the public square holding Rawls in his sights. He has been published in the Journal of Religion and Society, Faith and Philosophy, Think to name a few. He runs a very popular blog and podcast, again aimed at bringing philosophy to more people.
    The type of philosophy of religion that is growing in the US was not present in New Zealand until these two philosophers brought it here. New Zealand has a long way to go until it enjoys the philosophy of religion revival you are all familiar with but it is on its way now thanks in major part to the work of these two living philosophers of religion.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | July 9, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Thanks, Scylla.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | July 9, 2009
  • Mike Heffner

    I would have expected Daniel Dennett to make the top 100.  You should check out his book “Breaking the Spell”.

      

    (Quote)

    Comment | July 13, 2009
  • “John Bishop (christian pantheist, University of Aukland)”

    Should be Auckland.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | July 13, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Heffner,

    I’ve read ‘Breaking the Spell,’ but I’m not sure I’d call any of his published work ‘important’ in the philosophy of religion. He is primarily concerned with the philosophy of mind and philosophy of action and philosophy of biology.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | July 13, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Trevor,

    Thanks, fixed.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | July 13, 2009
  • ph

    i’m just curious, is it the case that philosophy of religion is exclusively “western” (i.e. judeo-christian tradition)? Or, none of those people working in non-judeo-christian tradition is worth mentioning?  

    (Quote)

    Comment | July 26, 2009
  • lukeprog

    ph,

    I’m primarily concerned with analytic philosophy of religion, but feel free to suggest some eastern philosophers of religion for the list.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | July 27, 2009
  • Footnote (1) is badly misleading, as I pointed out in the comment at Prosblogion. It makes some look like much better philosophers of religion than they are. It puts Bill Rowe at 25, and Bob Audi at 5, for instance. It puts Rowe far behind Kvanvig, Gutting and DeRose. That’s ridiculous, frankly, and it should have been noted explicitly in the post. What is being measured there is citations generally,not citations for philosophy of religion.  It’s troubling that this was not expressly stated.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | September 11, 2009
  • Brad

    A few suggestions:

    Hendrik Hart
    Mark C. Taylor
    Gianni Vattimo
    Rene Girard  

    (Quote)

    Comment | October 8, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Thanks, Brad, I’ll look into them.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | October 8, 2009
  • Brad

    Luke,

    I see you’ve updated the list with Girard, but none of the others. That’s no skin off my back, but I’m just curious how you decide which people to put on the list. Taylor, for sure, seems like he should be on any list of this sort (especially considering you have people like Caputo on the list).  

    (Quote)

    Comment | October 19, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Brad,

    I didn’t have time to look at Taylor’s work yet. I was already familiar with Girard.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | October 19, 2009
  • Roman

    Hi Luke,

    There’s a guy called Tim Mawson at Oxford:

    http://www.philosophy.ox.ac.uk/members/tim_mawson

    He’s published a lot in the Philosophy of Religion.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | October 23, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Thanks, Roman!  

    (Quote)

    Comment | October 23, 2009
  • Alex

    I’m under the impression that Bob Pennock is a Quaker, not an atheist.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | November 14, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Alex,

    Same thing. :)   

    (Quote)

    Comment | November 14, 2009
  • Michael

    D C Cramer: Hick might be more accurately called a “pluralist” than a “christian,” though he has identified critically with the Christian tradition throughout his career. At the present, he is neither a thiest in the traditional sense nor an atheist, but something more like an Ultimate Reality-ist.  

    Hick’s an interesting character. he was a Christian, in fact, Craig got one of his doctorates under him. But then he developed his own idea of pluralism, but still practices Christianity (at least the last I heard he did) because he liked it and it was comfortable. But I think he’s just covering his butt if he was wrong haha.

      

    (Quote)

    Comment | November 18, 2009
  • Hey another person you might want to be on the lookout for is R. Zachary Manis. A book by him and C. Stephen Evans on philosophy of religion just came out. I watched him in a panel debate againts Carrier and Stenger. The debate became a back and forth intellectual war between him and Carrier. Very even I would give him the nod though.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | November 27, 2009
  • lukeprog

    Marcus,

    I wish that debate had been recorded!  

    (Quote)

    Comment | November 27, 2009
  • Conor Gilliland

    “Alvin Plantinga: Finding bold new ways to hide the question-begging.”

    Methodological Naturalism: Finding bold new ways to hide the question-begging.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | December 2, 2009
  • Bebok

    Luke,

    Do you know Stephen R. L. Clark? I’ve only read some of his articles on animal ethics, but it seems like he’s a philosopher of religion as well.

    http://pcwww.liv.ac.uk/~srlclark/srlc.htm  

    (Quote)

    Comment | January 22, 2010
  • lukeprog

    Thanks, Bebok.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | January 22, 2010
  • Bebok

    Luke,

    One more suggestion would be Paul Helm:
    http://www.theopedia.com/Paul_Helm
    http://philpapers.org/autosense.pl?searchStr=Paul%20Helm

    Also, Brian Clack’s text is called “Religion and Wittgenstein’s Legacy” and it’s actually only a review of the book of that title.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | January 23, 2010
  • Bebok

    And Michael Dummett needs one more ‘t’.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | January 24, 2010
  • Bebok

    I’d also add his paper called “The Intelligibility of Eucharistic Doctrine” (1987), it’s his most popular work in the field, I guess.  

    (Quote)

    Comment | January 24, 2010
  • lukeprog

    Thanks, Bebok!  

    (Quote)

    Comment | January 24, 2010

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Powered by WordPress | Aeros Theme | TheBuckmaker.com WordPress Themes